Live Chat +91-9654251599
#1 Latest Legal Blogs

When Should You Approach the Supreme Court Through an SLP?

Know when to approach the Supreme Court through an SLP, limitation, grounds, documents, risks and legal help by Advocate BK Singh.

Get A Free Consultation
Trusted Legal Guidance
Experienced Legal Representation
Professional Legal Solutions

When Should You Approach the Supreme Court Through an SLP?

An order from the High Court or tribunal can turn life upside down. One wrong verdict can ruin your assets, freedom, business, rights over family, service career, commercial dispute, environmental controversy, banking issue or reputation. Many clients believe that after they lose a case before the High Court nothing worthwhile is left. Well, that is not necessarily true.

SLP means Special Leave Petition to the Supreme Court. It is a constitutional remedy provided under Article 136 of Constitution of India. By filing an SLP, the aggrieved party seeks special leave of Supreme Court to appeal against any judgment, order, decree, sentence or determination made by any court or tribunal in India. Article 136 clearly states that grant of special leave is discretionary and does not apply to any order passed by courts or tribunal under any law relating to Armed Forces.

However, SLP is not a matter of right nor it is a second chance to fight the same fight. The Supreme Court is not expected to try all facts afresh just because you are dissatisfied with the outcome. There must be a larger question of law, serious injustice, miscarriage of justice, material error of law, violation of natural justice, issue of jurisdiction or constitutional law. Clients know me as Advocate BK Singh and I have told many clients that the Supreme Court should be approached with reverence not fright.

Importance of SLP in India in 2026

An SLP matters because many substantial disputes made their way to a conclusion after receiving an order from the High Court or a tribunal. Civil disputes over property, criminal bail or conviction issues, service matters, family disputes, taxation issues, arbitration orders or even consumer disputes, DRT/DRAT matters, NGT orders and commercial litigations could all present questions of law that may merit the intervention of the Supreme Court.

Thousands of people across Delhi NCR, New Delhi, Ghaziabad, Noida, Gurugram, Faridabad, Lucknow, Jaipur, Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata, Ahmedabad and in fact all major Indian cities are on google searching “SLP lawyer in Supreme Court”, once they have received an adverse order. By that stage, limitations would have started running against them.

SLP is a good law because it vests the Supreme Court with a constitutional gatekeeping role. The Supreme Court may allow cases where the issues involved deserve to be heard at the apex court. The Supreme Court can deny leave to appeal where the dispute is purely based on factual issues, is settled by evidence or is not amenable to Article 136 intervention.

At BK Singh & Associates, Supreme Court work is handled keeping a sharp focus on the documents, timelines and the quality of drafting. Please refer to the firm’s Supreme Court service page to learn more about Supreme Court practice areas including SLPs, appeals, stay matters, transfer petitions, reviews and curatives.

Quick Facts

Point Details
What is it? A petition for appeal.
Constitutional basis Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Nature of remedy The grant of special leave to appeal is discretionary and is not a matter of right.
Forum The Supreme Court of India.
Permission to challenge Judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order of any court or tribunal in India.
Armed Forces exception Article 136 shall not apply to any judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order passed by any court or tribunal exercising jurisdiction in respect of any matter pertaining to the Armed Forces of the Union.
Usual limitation from grant of Judgment 90 days. The refusal of the certificate is 60 days.
Purpose of filing The granting of leave (permission) to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Simple meaning of SLP: Supreme Lawsuit Petition

SLP stands for Supreme Lawsuit Petition. The Petition filed under SLP meaning is to seek Permission/approval (leave) from the Honorable Apex Court to appeal against the order of a Lower Court or Tribunal.

SLP is different from a regular appeal as of right. Instead of jumping straight into appeal, the Applicant makes a plea to the Supreme Court for grant of leave to file an appeal.

If leave to appeal is granted by the court then the matter shall be heard as an appeal. If the leave is not granted, the SLP dies at this stage itself. Hence the importance of drafting, Grounds and case selection goes without saying.

Renowned Advocate BK Singh tells his clients the meaning of SLP in one sentence You are not only attacking the order passed but are first required to convince the Hon’ble Supreme Court that the matter at hand warrants the attention of the Apex Court.

The reasoning behind this! That’s why a SLP should not be filed in every case in a mechanical fashion. The Petition itself should demonstrate why the case qualifies to be heard under Article 136.

When is the Right Time to File an SLP in the Supreme Court?

When the impugned order causes serious legal prejudice & the facts of the case go beyond mere disagreement with findings. Look for these indicators of a strong SLP: Legal error/Jurisdiction not exercised properly/Natural justice violated/Perverse appreciation of record/ Constitutional concern / Grave injustice.

For instance, a civil dispute where title/possession/injunction was wrongly decided against you based on a serious legal principle would warrant an SLP against the adverse judgment of the High Court. Similarly, in criminal matters, if liberty/ conviction/ bail/ quashing/ sentencing issues are involved that raise serious concerns, seek an SLP.

Tribunal matters are another example where the Supreme Court can be approached by filing an SLP. However, each case will be decided on its own facts/trail based on the maintainability criteria. Many business owners, employees, borrowers, consumers and companies have approached Advocate BK Singh when an order from the labor court, CAT, debt recovery tribunal, income tax tribunal, consumer forum impacts their finances or operations.

Legal Provision Authorizing SLP in Supreme Court

Article 136 of the Constitution of India

Article 136 reads as so:

136. Special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court. 

(1) Notwithstanding anything in this Chapter, the Supreme Court may in its discretion grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence or order in any cause or matter passed or made by any court or tribunal in India.

Paragraph (2) of Article 136 excludes courts or tribunals which are constituted under any law relating to the Armed Forces.

Article 136 is wide but not absolute in practice. The provision places a huge responsibility on the Apex Court to exercise this jurisdiction sparingly. The Supreme Court is not intended to be a second ordinary avenue of appeal in every controversy.

Time Limit to File SLP

It is usual to file an SLP within 90 days from the judgment date/order date which are sought to be appealed against. If the High Court refuses to entertain the certificate of fitness to appeal to the Supreme Court, then 60 days is the limit calculated from order of refusal. Even certified-copy time and condonation of delay principles explained in various legal reports can play a role depending on the facts.

Advocate BK Singh counsels his clients that they should not try their luck in the last week. Condonation of delay is at the discretion of the Court. The party has to sufficiently explain the delay and based on the facts the Court may accept or reject the reasons for delay.

SLPs in SC have to be filed as per the Supreme Court Rules. Also, procedure for Advocate-on-Record must be kept in mind. SLP is not like sending a representation letter. Therefore, Advocate BK Singh focuses on document-based preparation. Factual, date and annexure related defects can cost the benefit of urgent listing, interim prayer or even credibility of the party.

Who Needs This Guidance?

Anyone who has got an unfavorable order either from High Court ,District Court(Appellate side),tribunal, commission or authority from where they can seek remedy in Supreme Court.

If you fall in any of the below categories then this guide will help you in better understanding of how to file your petition in the Supreme Court.

  • Property, divorce, inheritance or child related disputes. People having family disputes related to property, maintenance or children.
  • Criminal Orders affecting accused, complainant or victim.
  • Orders from trials or sessions court affecting people in criminal matters.
  • Orders involving businesses, partnerships are arbitration issues relating to Income Tax department, DRT,DRT orders, NCLT orders, NGT orders or license cancellations etc.
  • Orders affecting employers or employees related to Services laws.
  • Consumers, debtors, insurance policy holders or Shareholders where a serious adverse order has been passed or it is the last stage.
  • Non Indian Residents (NRIs) who have faced litigation in Indian courts, specifically those who have reached the High Court or tribunal stage.

We get many clients who have spent years and years in litigation. By the time their matter comes to the SLP stage one small mistake can cost your whole case.

What Matters may be fit for SLP?

SLP is not meant for every loss. It is a remedy for a situation where the order passed is palpably illegal, procedurally unfair or grossly prejudicial.

Civil SLPs include matters relating to property disputes, injunctions, partition, contracts, arbitration or any commercial disputes. Criminal SLPs include matters relating to bail, conviction, quashing proceedings, discharge, sentencing or any grave procedural unfairness. SLPs against tribunal orders include NGT, DRT/DRAT, NCLT/NCLAT orders, Consumer forums orders, Service matters or Tax tribunals.

The maintainability and strategy involved in approaching these SLPs differ from statute to statute based on the forum hierarchy and the nature of orders they can pass.

For more nuanced Supreme Court Advocacy, readers can visit our separate dedicated page on Supreme Court , High Court & Tribunals matters.

Typical Route Leading to Filing of an SLP Essay

Initial Considerations Pre-Filing of an SLP

Carefully read the judgment being challenged. What did the court say it was deciding? What did the court fail to address? Is the finding based on fact or law? Does the order result in a grave injustice?

Review the record. Sometimes pleadings, sometimes written submissions, sometimes evidence, annexures, previous orders, affidavits, applications and objections all come into play. An SLP cannot be crafted based solely on the story told by the client.

Decide on whether SLP is the appropriate remedy or if review, appeal, modification, clarification, objection to execution or some other legal course is more appropriate. This is where you may weed out clients.

Advocate BK Singh usually prepares a case note, chronology and issue list prior to advising on filing of SLP. It also helps us decide if the matter requires urgent stay, notice, response to caveat, certified copy(s), application for delay or some other document.

Once the decision is made to file the SLP. It moves through the stages of drafting, annexures, affidavit, vakalatnama, court fee, coordinate with AOR, cure defects and listing. The explanation on this stage is kept vague as the filing route can differ from case to case.

Documents Needed For SLP Consultation

Document Purpose
Impugned judgment/order The decree/order against which SLP is filed.
Certified copy, if accessible This is required for meeting limitation/filing requirements.
Pleadings of lower court. This helps in understanding what was originally placed before the court.
Written statements This will help determine what issues were argued.
Evidence and exhibits Helpful in case findings of fact are being challenged.
Prior Interim orders Helpful to understand the history of the case.
Copy of Tribunal records/copies of High Court judgments Depending on the nature of procedural defect raised.
Documents proving cause of delay This is required if limitation defect is raised.
Vakalatnama and identity evidence Required in case you have engaged someone to represent you.
Documents proving urgency Required if praying for stay of proceedings or interim relief.

As a general practice Advocate BK Singh recommends providing all papers instead of picking and choosing pages. The Supreme Court will have the record before it. You don't want to later discover that you hid your weakness.

Timelines and Decision Windows in SLP Matters

Time flies in SC matters. Typically you have a period of 90 days from judgment/order or 60 days from refusal of certificate, depending on the case nature. You can always explain the delay but you can never be casual about it.

Ideally the client must approach the lawyer on the day itself when judgment is pronounced/uploaded. Looking for certified copy/s, discussing with family, attempting informal settlement are all excuses that can be heard but limitations would still continue running.

If it is urgent, it needs to be filed faster. If matters of demolition, arrest, eviction, auction, recovery, possession, termination, blacklisting or any coercive action are threatened, then planning of interim relief would also be required along with SLP filing.

I tell clients that the first 10 to 15 days after an adverse order are best spent in legal consultation and not in confusion. You can’t draft well when in panic.

Mistakes Done Before Filing SLP Course Demo

SLPs fail because the case is meritless. Sometimes SLPs fail due to poor drafting.

SLPs fail due to mistakes done before filing..

Avoid making these..

  • Thinking SLP is like second appeal
  • Filing because your client got emotional blackbelt powers
  • Skipping limitation/certified copy
  • Submitting photocopy of lower court record to lawyer.
  • Cutting and pasting high court arguments verbatim and hoping SC will read it.
  • Thinking about Supreme Court when filing writ petition in HC
  • Not knowing when review is better than filing SLP
  • Seeking absurd interim relief
  • Filing blindly without explaining substantial legal error in lower court order

Always remember Advocate BK Singh says Supreme Court drafting requires ‘selectivity’. A draft with 20 grounds full of weakness might not be as effective as a focused petition with merely 5 strong legal points.

Risks of Ignoring SLP Remedy

Not filing an SLP can result in the adverse order becoming final for all practical purposes. Property can change hands, recovery can proceed, criminal punishments can become irrevocable, service benefits can be lost, or commercial liability can ripen.

Families may delay because they are litigation weary. Businesses may delay because they do not want to incur further legal expenses. Accused persons may procrastinate if they are doubtful about their chances in the Supreme Court.

Delay often closes options. Delay can also jeopardize interim relief. If the adverse party executes against the disputed order, before you approach the Supreme Court, the case can get complicated.

Advocate BK Singh believes in filing petitions before the Supreme Court when necessary. He believes in quickly assessing matters so the client knows if filing of SLP is worth considering.

What Matters require you to approach a Supreme Court Lawyer?

Approach a Supreme Court lawyer as soon as you get a negative High Court or Tribunal order in cases where liberty, property, money, business, job, family matters, rights and reputation or statutory matters are involved.

You need to consult a lawyer if the order is against a well-settled legal position/ law, based on ignoring relevant documents/papers, if principles of natural justice were violated, where jurisdiction was exercised erroneously, consequences are grave, and causing severe prejudice so that it cannot be allowed to continue.

Advocate BK Singh can help you determine if your matter can be challenged through SLP/review/appeal/stay/transfer petition/contempt route/Object to execution or some other form of legal remedy. Seek that opinion quickly, before limitations become stringent on you.

How BK Singh Advocate Can Help

BK Singh Advocate offers legal services for Supreme Court, High Court and tribunal matters such as SLPs/Civil/ Criminal Appeals/Interim stay/Transfer petitions/Review related legal consultation, Civil Matters/Criminal Matters/Property disputes/Commercial disputes/DRT matters/NGT cases/litigation matters etc.

Advocate BK Singh reads every case record thoroughly to ensure legal aspects such limitation/maintainability /drafting quality/ realistically what legal relief can be granted. He doesn't assure of success instead he analyses if approaching the Supreme Court is legally viable and worth economically.

Clients located in Delhi NCR, New Delhi, Ghaziabad, Noida, Gurugram and all over India may approach him for legal consultation if their matter requires assistance from the Supreme Court of India.

FAQs.

Q1. What is a Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court?

Ans. A Special Leave Petition is a petition filed under Article 136 of the Constitution of India before the Supreme Court. By way of an SLP you ask the Supreme Court to grant special leave or permission to appeal against any judgement, decree, sentence, determination or order of any court or tribunal in India. The Supreme Court first grants leave to appeal or not.

Q2. When should I file an SLP after receiving a High Court order?

Ans. You should file an SLP against a High Court order when the order causes significant legal prejudice to you and raises a strong legal point. Such situations include but are not limited to: violation of natural justice, error of jurisdiction, grave injustice, misinterpretation of law, serious procedural irregularity or order affecting your liberty, property, business or statutory rights. Simply because you have lost the case is not a ground to file Supreme Court SLP.

Q3. Is SLP a sure shot remedy?

Ans. No. Filing an SLP is not a sure shot remedy. Under Article 136, the Supreme Court has discretionary powers. It may grant leave to appeal or not, issue notice to the opposite party or not, grant interim relief or refuse to interfere with the order passed by the High Court or tribunal or dispose of the SLP at the threshold. Every SLP is dependent on facts of case, applicable law, urgency if any, case record, maintainability, worth of legal grounds etc.

Q4. What is the limitation for filing an SLP?

Ans. In general, you file an SLP within 90 days of the judgment/order which you wish to challenge. However, if the High Court refuses to grant a certificate of fitness to appeal to the Supreme Court then the limitation is 60 days from refusal of such certificate. Sometimes delay can be justified by filing an application to condone delay, but condonation of delay is at the discretion of the Court.

Q5. Can an SLP be filed against orders from tribunals?

Ans. Yes. SLP against orders from tribunals can be filed in appropriate cases subject to legal maintainability, statutory provisions and facts. Orders passed by tribunals like NGT, DRT/DRAT, NCLT/ NCLAT, Consumer forums, service matters, tax appeals etc. can come up to Supreme Court if the facts and nature of the case warrant the same. The Supreme Court has to be convinced that the order passed by the tribunal needs to be scrutinized by the largest Constitutional Court in India.

Q6. Can the Supreme Court grant a stay of proceedings or order if I file an SLP?

Ans. Yes. The Supreme Court can grant interim relief including stay in appropriate cases but it is at the discretion of the Court. Petitioner has to convince the Court that there is urgency to grant stay, that the legal ground raised for filing SLP has merit, that the balance of convenience lies in favour of petitioner and that you will suffer serious prejudice if Court refuses to grant stay.

Q7. Is SLP filing possible in criminal law cases?

Ans. Yes. SLP can be filed in criminal cases which require consideration by the Supreme Court. Criminal SLP can relate to matters involving grant of bail, conviction & sentence, quashing of proceedings against someone, discharge, investigation issues, procedural irregularities etc. affecting personal liberty of parties. The Supreme Court will not entertain every criminal case passing an order. Strong legal grounds have to be pointed out.

Q8. What documents should I prepare for SLP filing?

Ans. Required documents are mainly impugned judgment/order ( certified copy if available) along with pleadings, list of applications and affidavits filed, written submissions and arguments made, evidence and annexures relied on, previous orders on relevant issues, entire record of tribunal/High Court if available, documents related to limitation issue, identity proof/address details and of course vakalatnama. For urgent cases of staying an order, documents proving immediate threat/risk would also be required.

Q9. Can I file for review and SLP both?

Ans. Decision to file review versus SLP or file both review and SLP depends on facts, limitation issues involved, forum where case is pending, nature of the order passed and overall legal strategy. Review is usually filed before the same court which passed the order. SLP is filed before the Supreme Court. Both can be filed but without proper advice it can lead to procedural complications.

Q10. How can Advocate BK Singh assist me with an SLP?

Ans. Advocate BK Singh can help you by reviewing the impugned order passed against you, examining records of the lower courts, identifying legal angles which you can raise, help you understand limitation implications, give a legal advice on maintainability of your claim, prepare chronology of major events in the case, assist you with drafting options and coordinate SLP filing with Supreme Court through correct process.

CONCLUSION

SLP is not a medicine for all losing litigants. SLP should be filed when there is error of law and serious injustice is involved or where it concerns procedural unfairness, a jurisdictional defect or an issue that warrants consideration by the Supreme Court itself.

Time is important. Documents are important. Drafting is important.

Mr. Advocate BK Singh recommends to Clients to seek legal opinion at the earliest after adverse order rather than delaying it till the time limitation starts looming or other side starts acting on the judgment/order. If the order of the High Court or Tribunal has serious implications in your matter, proper assessment of SLP can help you understand if approaching the Supreme Court is worthwhile.

Disclaimer

This article is intended to be of general informational use only. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice regarding any individual case or circumstance. You should not rely on this article for legal advice.

About the Author

Advocate BK Singh is a practicing Supreme Court, High Court & tribunal lawyer. Advocate BK Singh has handled numerous SLP(s), appeals, stay petitions, Civil & Criminal matters, property disputes, commercial disputes, DRT matters, NGT cases and other legal proceedings throughout the country. Advocate BK Singh specializes in providing document based advice, reviewing limitation and maintainability of the legal proceedings and drafting strategy to his clients who wish to move their cases to higher courts. Advocate BK Singh guides individuals, families, small business owners and companies on whether a matter can be heard and tried by Supreme Court of India in exercise of its discretionary powers under Article 136 read with Constitution of India.

There's no reason for concern. There is no difficult-to-understand legalese.

Someone who has helped many people with the same problems gives you clear, honest advice. We want to make the legal process easy to understand and use for everyone.

Schedule Your Consultation
html